The first part of January brings with it a
plethora of accolades and awards. I figure
this is because most people have little to do
in December and can devote time to this
kind of trivia. Since I don’t have the time, I’ll
just steal their stuff and cobble it into something
that relates to real life and transport
packaging.
For example: the Wacky Warning Label
Contest. This one’s been around for nearly a
dozen years. It’s conducted by Michigan Lawsuit
Abuse Watch (www.mlaw.org) to reveal
how lawsuits, and fear of lawsuits, have driven
the proliferation of common-sense warnings
on U.S. products. The winner this year is
somewhat related to material handling—and
because it’s a label—indirectly to packaging.
The winner is a label on a small, front-end
loader that warns, “Danger: Avoid Death.”
It explains: “Before removing seat belt and
leaving
ADVERTISEMENT
|
seat, lower lift arms to ground or rest
lift arms on stops. Stop engine. Lock park
brake and remove key.”
Words of common sense, which is not all
that common these days. And, there's another
contest nearer and dearer to the hearts
of writers—the Word of the Year—conducted
by the American Dialect Society (www.americandialect.org). This organization has
been around since 1889. It lists a lot of words
we’d be better off without and a few categories
of words to which we should pay attention.
Chosen as Most Likely to Succeed this
year is the word “green.” I suspect, by next
year, it will make the list of words we’ve heard
too much of; however, for now, green is the
new green (a phrase, by the way, chosen as
too overworked: “X is the new Y,” etc.).
I’m sure this won’t be the last word on the
word “green.” In transport packaging, we’ve
long talked about reusable containers, recycling,
reducing material content through
better use of technology, etc. And, while
packaging has often been viewed as an endof-
the-line process, it’s rapidly moving to the front line of managers’ concerns.
The more I dig for the “why” behind the
greening of virtually everything, the more I
encounter a word I dislike—although marketing
people embrace it—“trend.”
Among the meanings of “trend,” the one that
bothers me most, when applied to environmental
concerns, is, “current style or preference.”
Detractors of environmental initiatives at work
around our warming globe say, “It’s just a trend.
Next year we’ll be looking at…”
I don’t think so. I’m an optimist (defined
as a guy who carries a camera when he goes
fishing). Green has staying power. Business
plans are being created around green initiatives.
New markets have arisen. Careers
launched.
The climate (business as well as what’s
happening outside your office window) is
changing, forcing people and companies
along the supply chain (another term I’m
ready to retire) to give first consideration as
to how they’ll do packaging at the end of the
line. Many are accepting the challenge and
searching for ways either to do more with
less, or more with something else. Others are
being dragged into the future kicking and
screaming. And, then, there are those who
will miss the wave—the Green Wave as author
Andrew Winston (Green to Gold, Yale
University Press, October 2006) describes
the greening of the business world.
This time around, the smart people—those
who pay attention to the reality of climate
change—will find ways to create strategic opportunities
out of environmental challenges.
And, while it might not be possible to spin
gold from straw, evidence points to the alchemy
of producing dollars from sense.
Clyde E. Witt
Editor-in-Chief
cwitt@MHMonline.com
Clyde Witt has been
reporting on transport
packaging issues and
trends for more than
20 years.
|