There’s nothing like wandering around a trade
show when you’re seeking answers to pressing
questions. And, this year’s Pack Expo—like any
Pack Expo—was the place to find plenty of both
answers and questions.
One answer I was looking for was whether this
whole sustainability trend is just a marketing manager’s
dream, or is it for real this time? Based on
what I heard while speaking with many equipment
vendors and transport packaging professionals,
we’re in this for the long haul. It’s not hyperbole,
although there is an element of hype in it.
People are serious about finding ways to create
sustainability in products and packaging, even if
we are still challenged to find a good definition.
One of the better definitions I heard was from
Jeff Wooster, who currently leads the sustainability
packaging technology team at Dow Chemical. Although
it might
ADVERTISEMENT
|
be construed as a cop-out, Wooster
says sustainability is what it is to you. Pushed for
some clarification, Wooster says, “It’s how you
maximize performance with a minimal use of resources.”
As Wooster points out, the focus of all this talk
and action around sustainability has been about
either material—making more out of less—or running
a building in the most environmentally responsible
manner.
Another critical piece of the puzzle, he notes,
is that businesses are going to have to face the labor
issue to become sustainable. “To sustain your
business,” says Wooster, “you’re going to have to
look at the people element as well as things like
infrastructure of your location. These are also part
of any lifecycle analysis, just as much as total considerations
of use of other resources.”
I thought about that. He’s right. It’s not always
about paper versus plastic. It’s about litterbugs,
baby boomers and water supplies, too.
Looking for some global perspective, I spoke
with Wil Schoenmakers, global head of consumer products, P.A. Consulting in the U.K. He says the
challenge with global product development is that
every country is different. “Since we lack definitions
and standards,” says Schoenmakers, “an
exporting company really has to know where it
currently is [on the sustainability continuum] and
where it wants to be in five years.” As he points out,
a problem for a company wanting to do the right
thing is that it can never be sure what the end user
will do with packaging material.
So, I was back to the people issue.
A partial solution to this sustainability dilemma,
says Henry Wischusen, director, Integrated Development
(Atlanta), is to design our way out. “Reduce
the amount of packaging used by optimizing
the design of the product and the transport packaging,”
he says.
Wischusen noted that about 40% of the impact
on Wal-Mart’s packaging material-reduction scorecard
can be accounted for in transport packaging
material. Want to reduce the amount of transport
packaging material required to get the goods safely
to the distribution center? Use air-ride suspension
trailers, rather than leaf springs, for example, suggests
Wischusen.
To that, I’d add some education on how pallet
loads are handled once they’re off loaded and
moved around within the building. And, it might
prove educational for packaging engineers and
distribution center managers to take a road trip
through the total environment a package will travel
before deciding on what packaging material is required.
Oh, I’m back to the people issues, aren’t I?
|