The power shift in Washington means a new set of priorities. Now's the time to do what you can to make sure legislators' agenda matches up with yours.
So the Democrats have regained a majority in the
House and Senate. Some characterize this as divided government. Others call it a reinstatement
of checks and balances. Whatever you call it, industry must be vigilant about how the new power players
could affect U.S. business and markets.
The new legislators may not have material handling on
their minds in putting forth their agendas, but you can be
sure the bills they'll be introducing in their first year will
shape what goes on in the country's factories and distribution centers. (See the box, On the Agenda,)
Fred Thimmel, president of Bryant Products (Ixonia, WI,
www.bryantpro.com) and chairman of the Conveyor Equipment Manufacturers Association's (www.cemanet.org) government affairs committee, says a flurry of new bills is customary whenever new legislators arrive. This year's flurry
ADVERTISEMENT
|
of
activity is more intense due to the unusually large freshman
class.
"While many intriguing bills have been introduced, it is
far, far too early to say if any will gain traction," he says.
"Conversely, bills that have sat in committee are generally
dropped from consideration and their bill numbers are recirculated for use on new pieces of proposed legislation.
Casualties of this process are numerous bills dealing with
medical and product liability reform, expansion of employer liability in medical malpractice cases and greater
oversight of OSHA findings."
Jason Poblete, an attorney in the regulatory litigation
group of Reed Smith LLC (www.reedsmith.com), expects
labor issues to be priorities early on. Before re-entering the
private sector he served as spokesman and senior adviser to
Bill Thomas (R-Calif.).
"Ted Kennedy (D-Mass.) chairs the health committee in
the senate and Congressman George Miller (D-Calif.) is
taking the lead of the Labor Committee," says Poblete.
"They'll bring a disproportionate interest to OSHA. But if
they want to pass any legislation it will have to be on a bipartisan basis if they want the president's signature.
Healthcare appears to be the starting point for the Senate,
but there will be different issues trial ballooned, especially
as they enter the budget consideration period. We'll see
how the industries respond."
With so many presidential candidates making themselves
known for the 2008 election, chances are the legislative
agenda will lighten considerably as that election nears.
That's why businesspeople need to keep an eye on both
parties. Poblete expects immigration, pension and healthcare issues to move forward. Minimum wage will be another
big issue early on, especially leading up to the summer.
Early signs coming out of OSHA (www.osha.gov) point
to a focus on helping businesses to be more compliant with
existing regulations. Homeland security will be mixed in
with immigration reform and port security, which will place new security demands on the private
sector. "When you have massive national immigration reform, there may
be dislocations in the economy that will
affect all industries," says Poblete.
Strength in Numbers
To address possible regulatory
changes, industry associations are engaging their members and partnering
with other associations that have lobbying leverage. Rick Blasgen, CEO of the
Council of Supply Chain Management
Professionals (www.cscmp.org), says
he's expecting logistics to be a key area
of focus for many government power
brokers.
"To me, when something affects
commerce as transportation has, I
think it will get increased attention," he
says. "With ports it started with security.
It's a congestion issue, and those politicians who say every single container
ought to be inspected have no idea
what they're talking about. That will
just stop the world in its tracks. When it
affects goods getting to people, that's
when attention will be driven to it."
Indeed, when it comes to trade issues, free and safe can be conflicting
priorities. That's why House Bill H.R. 1
is getting a lot of industry attention.
The bill would require 100% scanning
of U.S.-bound containers loaded in
China and the Netherlands. Last year,
Patty Murray (D-Wash.) led the opposition to the bill and will remain a key opponent. It will come down to whether
customs can successfully convince Congress and the media that 100% risk assessment and scanning will create the
same level of security as 100% physical
inspection.
Blasgen is making sure CSCMP participates with the International Warehouse Logistics Association (IWLA,
www.iwla.com) and the Warehousing
Education and Research Council
(WERC, www.werc.org), to educate law
makers on such concerns.
"Just as we expect supply chain partners to collaborate, so should associations," Blasgen says. "We underestimate our ability as voters and professionals to educate lawmakers on what it
is they need to know to make our country better in terms of the supply chain
profession. We can have more of a
voice if we're joined at the hip."
Joel D. Anderson, President & CEO
of the IWLA, agrees that the global supply chain will be high on the legislative
priority list. The IWLA's job is not only to educate lawmakers, but to lobby
them.
"The environmental agenda will
move into the workplace on the diesel
particulate issue and I believe it is here
that business is vulnerable," he says.
"Business may have to adopt a pollution reduction strategy just as they have
for accident prevention."
Of course, environmental issues are
connected to healthcare, and when it comes to warehousing, balancing the
well being of workers against the costs
of keeping them healthy could become
an even greater challenge for U.S. businesses.
"Healthcare will be a big campaign
issue, and that's a very serious problem," says Bob Shaunnessey, executive director of WERC. According to
WERC's annual salary survey, the average warehouse worker makes about
$25,000 a year. Family health coverage can cost $15,000-$20,000 a year.
"Right now the system is broke and it will take something serious to fix it,"
Shaunnessey continues. "You have a
cost spiral that's partially driven by
doctors protecting themselves against
liability. So you have lots of tests and
things happening in the healthcare
system that, using normal judgment,
you wouldn't do. But doctors resort to
every test they can think of now to
protect themselves against liability in
case they might be sued. That's crazy.
The way healthcare institutions raise
rates in general to cover their expenses for people who are not insured is a tax on employers."
In summary, businesspeople need
to keep their eyes on the new legislators. By communicating early and
openly with them, both as individual
taxpayers and through trade associations, business may find common
ground. The associations related to
material handling and logistics have
an opportunity and an obligation to
protect the interests of their members.
"If we handle the next five to ten
years correctly on the policy side and
on the safety and security side, we
can be way ahead of the first responder unit in homeland defense," concludes attorney Poblete. "This is a
good legislative season to take advantage of divided government. That's
the silver lining. The days of congress beating up on the private sector are gone."
|
On the Agenda
- The 9/11 Commission Recommendation Act (HR 1), which is pending
in the Senate, would require the electronic sealing and scanning of all shipping
containers before being loaded on ships bound for the United States. The CBO
estimates the cost of container scanning to the federal government to be $160
million over five years. Total private sector costs would reportedly exceed $131
million in 2007 alone if the bill is enacted.
- Access to Capital for Entrepreneurs Act (HR 578) would amend the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow a credit against income tax for
qualified equity investments in certain small businesses. Qualified equity
investments would not exceed $500,000 or $250,000 in a qualified small
business. This bill was introduced into the Ways and Means Committee on
January 17, 2007.
- Social Security for Americans Only Act (HR 190) would prevent the
crediting of wages earned, and self-employment income derived, by individuals
who are not citizens or nationals of the United States to coverage under the
old-age, survivors and disability insurance program. This bill was introduced to
the Ways and Means January 4, 2007.
- Bio-Fuels & Renewable Energy Sources. A number of bills offering
tax incentives to the bio-fuels industry have been introduced into both
Chambers of Congress. Such incentives could benefit companies involved in
bulk material handling.
- Immigration Reform (S 9, HR 147, HR 134, HR 572 and HR 98) are
among an array of proposed immigration legislation. The proposals seek better
ways to deal with illegal immigrants and the companies that employ them and
improve the tracking of documented immigrants.
- OSHA Reform—Site Reporting Act (HR 141) would require the
Secretary of Labor to revise certain regulations under the Occupational Safety
and Health Act of 1970 to require employers to keep a "site log" for all
recordable injuries and illnesses occurring among all employees on a particular
site, no matter if such employees are employed directly by the site-controlling
employer or by contractors or leasing services. This was introduced January 4,
2007.
- National Right To Work Act (HR 697). This would repeal existing
statutes that allow the firing of workers for refusal to pay union dues or "fees"
to union officials. It would eliminate closed shops and forcing workers to pay
dues in shops where unions exist. The law would not prevent anyone from
joining a union. This was debated in House Committee January 24, 2007.
|
|
Q&A with OSHA
MHM asked an OSHA spokesperson for an
update on the health and safety regulator's
priorities for the coming year.
What's the link between industrial
safety issues and some of the big
items on the Administration's
agenda, such as healthcare?
Just last month, OSHA released a new
workplace safety and health guidance that will help employers prepare for an
influenza pandemic. Guidance on Preparing
Workplaces for an Influenza Pandemic,
developed in collaboration with the U.S.
Dept. of Health and Human Services,
provides general guidance for all types of
workplaces, describes the differences
between seasonal, avian and pandemic
influenza, and presents information on the
nature of a potential pandemic, how the
virus is likely to spread and how exposure
is likely to occur.
OSHA is also working on a new
guidance that will offer infection control
information about standard precautions
and transmission-based precautions as
well as standards that will have special
importance to pandemic preparedness
and response.
Will there be a new approach to
safety in the workplace with the
new players in Congress?
At a recent ceremony attended by
Assistant Secretary for Occupational Safety
and Health Edwin Foulke in Lynn, Mass.,
Senator Kennedy and he agreed that they
need to work together. We will, and Mr.
Foulke is confident that the results will be
productive.
Where are the biggest opportunities for improving safety, and in
which industries?
OSHA has identified seven industries
with high injury/illness rates and a high
proportion of severe injuries/illnesses for
focused targeting of outreach, education
and enforcement activity. These industries
include:
- Public warehousing and storage
- Landscaping and horticultural services
- Oil and gas field services
- Fruit and vegetable processing
- Blast furnace and basic steel products
- Ship and boat building and repair
- Concrete and concrete products.
During fiscal year 2006, OSHA
conducted 1,481 inspections within these
seven industries. Many of these
inspections were a result of local emphasis
programs (LEPs), which area and regional
offices develop to address specific hazards n their location. The objective of OSHA's
effort is to significantly lower the
disproportionately high injury and illness
rates in these industries.
During fiscal year 2006, OSHA conducted
18,895 inspections (out of 38,579 total
inspections) that were related to an LEP,
showing that using local expertise and
knowledge to target specific industries and
hazards allows for more efficient use of
OSHA's resources.
|
|