RFID: The Chips Are Down
This isn’t
another “RFID has finally arrived!” column for two reasons. First,
RFID (radio frequency identification) has already arrived and has been
performing admirably in many applications around the world for a number of
years. Second, because RFID is continuing to evolve, we’re going to see
new technologies and new applications for the foreseeable future. So, in that
respect, RFID won’t “arrive” for quite some time.
What I want to talk
about is the current evolution and the hype that may get attached
ADVERTISEMENT
|
to it.
A report recently
published by IDTechEx examines smart labels and makes particular note of
“chipless” RFID tags. Chipless tags, as you might suppose, do not
contain silicon chips (aka integrated circuits or ICs). Instead, they rely on
thin film, magnetic resonance, fine wires and other methods to generate unique
signal patterns discernible by a suitable reader.
The advantages of a
“chipless” tag should be obvious: a) much lower cost, and b)
improved flatness/thinness. Even with all the recent and foreseeable advances
in silicon chip design and manufacture, chip-based tags are still relatively
expensive. Further, the chips do produce a distinct “bump” in
labels. When printing labels, that “bump” has to be factored into
the label design and, where space is tight, this can present some challenges.
The
“hype” that may become associated with chipless tags is that they
are destined to replace the current generation of smart labels. This may be
true in some closed applications but it would be a gross overstatement of
current chipless tag capabilities.
The chipless tags
that are available today do not carry “data” in the conventional
sense. What they offer is a distinct response pattern that can be associated
with a particular data structure. That is, a group of tags can be manufactured
to return the same response pattern and that pattern or signal can be
associated with a unique product number. Alternately, chipless tags can
generate unique responses that can serve, in effect, as serial numbers.
How important is
the distinction between a tag that carries data versus one that provides a
response pattern?
If readers can be
programmed to return a data string useful to the host system, it becomes
transparent to the system and isn’t an issue. On the other hand, the
logistics of distributing pattern-product ID matching tables could be a
nightmare. The complexity of this task would likely outweigh the cost savings
offered by chipless tags.
For serial numbers,
it becomes even more problematic in any but a closed system. Since the pattern
is simply unique to that item, distribution of massive look-up tables would be
required for positive identification in an open system. In a closed system, or
for some types of product validation, however, such tags could work quite well
since they would be virtually impossible to counterfeit.
Although worth
investigating for closed systems, these chipless technologies are not destined
to take over the world any time soon.
A much more
exciting prospect — one that will serve as a direct challenge to
current-day smart labels — is just over the horizon (and possibly not too
far over it).
The IDTechEx report
highlights RFID labels employing “printed” circuits. That is, the
components of an IC would be created using something like conventional,
multi-color printing processes instead of the complex and delicate
manufacturing process required in silicon IC production. This concept
isn’t Buck Rogers stuff. It was demonstrated several years ago with the
creation of transistors and other building blocks of circuitry, and a lot of
development has gone on since then.
The size of the
circuits, with current technology, is “huge” compared to silicon
— but that’s not an issue here. An integrated RFID tag, complete
with antenna, memory and all the other necessary components, would be
relatively easy to fit on a conventional shipping label. Because the circuits
are relatively simple and the real estate exists, RFID is likely to be one of
the first beneficiaries of this technology once it’s perfected.
But for now, if
someone tries to hype you on chipless tags, just pass the salsa.
For a review of the IDTechEx report, or to order the
report, contact AIM Global, 634 Alpha Drive, Pittsburgh, PA 15238,
(www.aimglobal.org/aimstore/idtechex.htm), or contact IDTechEx directly at
www.idtechex.com/book2.html.
Bert Moore, contributing editor, bmoore@idat.com