Innovate for Conveyor Safety A company in Sparta, Wisconsin, is facing a $150,000 fine because an
employee suffered several fractures in his pelvis, leg and both hips while
performing maintenance on a conveyor last year. Could the company have
prevented this tragedy by following OSHA's conveyor safety standard?
Probably not, because OSHA doesn't have a conveyor safety standard ? unlike
the standards for cranes and lift trucks. Of course, there's the General
Duty Clause, section 5(a)(1) of the OSH Act, that requires companies to
maintain a safe environment in their plants, and there are safety
considerations in ANSI/ASME B20.1 Safety Standard for Conveyors and Related
Equipment, sponsored and published by the American Society of Mechanical
Engineers.
That's about it. Since the '70s, consultant George Schultz has called for a
conveyor safety document from OSHA, to no avail. Schultz's proposed
standard would cover
ADVERTISEMENT
|
both safe equipment and safe personnel, as well as
maintenance.
Unfortunately, OSHA probably will not devote any time or resources to
conveyors, and certainly not to a standard. OSHA limits its effort to
guidelines ? and ergonomics guidelines, at that.
With no standard in sight, conveyor safety has become the responsibility of
two associations: the Conveyor Equipment Manufacturers Association and the
Conveyor Product Section of Material Handling Industry. CEMA, for example,
has a safety program that offers labels, posters and videos at
www.cemanet.org.
OSHA comes close to a safety standard for conveyors with the Control of
Hazardous Energy (Lockout/Tagout) standard, CFR part 1910.147. This
standard was promulgated in 1989, and OSHA tells me that its enforcement is
being updated. While lockout/tagout applies to all types of machinery, it
is especially applicable to conveyors. The original standard says things
like, "The amount of detail in a procedure for shutting down a simple
conveyor with a single source of power and single feed or discharge points
could be much less than the procedure for shutting down a long assembly
line conveyor with multiple feed and discharge points and multiple power
sources."
The lockout/tagout standard is most easily visualized when you think about
a conveyor system with workstations that are spread throughout the plant.
Nevertheless, even a single conveyor can be the cause of a lockout/tagout
accident.
Absent standards, innovation in conveyor design is a better approach to
safety. Modularity, flexibility and speed do not necessarily detract from
safe operation of conveyors. Neither does that staple of conveyor
selection, reliability. Conveyor suppliers can provide equipment that is
modular, flexible, fast and safe, as well as offer maintenance support and
single-source shopping.
An example of innovation in design is the Accuzone accumulation conveyor.
It combines a belt conveyor with a standard roller conveyor. The result is
an accumulation conveyor that prevents packages from sliding on an incline
or decline.
The Conveyor Products Section of Material Handling Institute will spotlight
innovation at the NA2004 show with its presentation "Applying Conveyor and
Sortation Systems: What Are the Options?"
Relying on suppliers for both conveyor design and installation gives you
more options to choose from. The newest option in conveyor application
comes in automatic identification technology for tracking packages through
the system. Conveyor suppliers are experimenting with radio frequency
identification (RFID) for greater accuracy in read rates.
RFID is another area where innovation will improve both conveyor efficiency
and safety ? by assisting the "human element" in the material handling
productivity formula.
bernknill@aol.com
|